"...The original Optimized Results logo came to me while meditating, around 1974, long before I learned of the Enneagram.  I was thinking about the three cores of our being, (feeling, thinking, and sensory knowing) and how the balance would create some form of perfection.  If each had a dominant and two recessives (my Dad is a biochemist) there would be three aspects of the three cores of being.  I painted my vision (my Mom is an artist) in the three primary colors, each interlocking piece identical and even, so that they would represent the total palette.  One day while studying the Enneagram I looked up at the painting on my wall, and saw how it would fit, inscribed perfectly with each point of each triad lining up within the shapes I had dreamed up so long ago.  I had never felt so in line with my destiny and my soul's work..."

Gurdjieff saw the Enneagram as being far more universally applicable.  He felt that the Enneagram was a universal symbol containing all knowledge, if one was able to properly interpret.  The Enneagram is a symbol that illustrates dynamic shifts in the natural world.  You can illustrate the dynamic process of water evaporating, collecting in clouds, condensing, precipitating, soaking into the Earth, flowing back toward the oceans, and so forth with the Enneagram.  The numbered points that most people are familiar with are originally represented by musical scale tones, and Gurdjieff describes the dynamic shifts in Octaves.

The modern (and popularized) version of the Enneagram of Personalities (also known as Ego-Structure) emerged in the 20th century, from the Bolivian psychologist Oscar Ichazo who was a student of Gurdjieff's work, but whose personality system stands apart from Gurdjieff's teachings.  His own perspectives and filters excited his interest in the dynamic shifts of personalities.  Ichazo taught his system to a group of followers in Arica, Chile, where one of his pupils, the Chilean psychiatrist Claudio Naranjo, became a prominent Enneagram writer and teacher.

Naranjo felt strongly about the intersection of psychology and spirituality, and this was the basis of his teachings, which he brought to the United States around 1970.  The Gestalt therapy of Fritz Perl and Karen Horney’s self-psychology were also strong influences in Naranjo’s teachings.  A small group of students living in Berkeley with Naranjo were responsible for the further changes to the Enneagram’s presentation over the last few decades.  Helen Palmer's book "The Enneagram," (HarperCollins, 1988) greatly popularized the Enneagram of Personality, and perhaps added a bit more fuel to the rift between Naranjo and Ichazo's Arica Institute.  They spent a lot of time in litigation.

The current perception of the Enneagram of Personality has been heavily influenced and controlled by Don Richard Riso, who took his Jesuit studies of the Enneagram, and applied deep psychological theory to elaborate and flesh out the descriptions of the "nine types," striving for a more positive view.  (Personality Types: Using the Enneagram for Self-Discovery, Houghton-Mifflin, 1987) Riso espouses the "single dominant wing" theory, and what may be the most important contribution to popular Enneagram theory: the Levels of Development from unhealthy to healthy in psychological terms.  By introducing this third dimension to the knowledge-base, functionality and applicability skyrocketed.  The model began to look more like stacked plates; each an Enneagram at a different Level, with parallel developmental aspects.

Ian Blei was inspired by this three-dimensional concept, as the more Gurdjieff-like model he had been working with since the 1970's required other models to illustrate developmental growth.  A core divergence here was to not use psychotherapy as the basis of study (Ichazo, Naranjo, Palmer, Riso) but to work with consciousness as a part of "natural science," thus illustrated by Gurdjieff's and Ouspensky's Universal Enneagram.  This creates an enormous difference in approach, as psychology works with what is called a "disease model," looking at what is wrong or unhealthy, and striving to fix it.  Consciousness uses a "wellness model," that looks at naturally available resources, and how to maximize upon them. This lends itself more easily to self-development, rather than being "fixed by a doctor."

Perhaps most importantly, this model is able to create a tangible path toward balance and harmony of our internal components, and the intentional development of our consciousness.  Part of the accuracy is due to eschewing behavioral observations for engagement and involvement, to center on motivation and fixation, as the original Jesuit writings touched upon, and then adapts Gurdjieff's internal "pentagram" of Centers.

Each of the Enneagram types has the unique gifts of the five types that comprise their "constellation" of perspectives.  These gifts are what they contribute to the full spectrum of human potential. However, each gift has a dark side. Much like the yin-yang symbol, there is a little shadow in each gift and a little gift in each shadow.

Gifts and traits are certainly illuminated by the  Integram™ as well as the Enneagram, but that is by no means the limit of its capabilities.  We can't understand ourselves or others with a laundry list of observable traits, but as the study of Hermeneutics shows us, we can enter another person's worldview and understand what natural and social influences created their beliefs. The internal landscapes and self-talk that reveals them give us such a powerful use of the Enneagram.  We can go beyond walking in someone's shoes and see the world through their eyes.  The Enneagram shows us a model of Nine co-existing "truths."  One does not have to be wrong for another to be right, and this is the beginning of all conflict resolution, and all compassion in the world.

Optimized Results uses this philosophy and approach to improve the effectiveness of communication, and the quality of relationships.  When we can truly see how each of us views the world, and how that impacts our communication, we can begin communicating with one another, rather than talking at one another.